Could the A’s brass be prepping to sell the team? Or freeze it? – San Francisco Chronicle

OAKLAND, CA - AUGUST 27: Matt Olson #28 and Matt Joyce #23 of the Oakland Athletics celebrates after Olson hit a two-run homer against the Texas Rangers in the bottom of the second inning at Oakland Alameda Coliseum on August 27, 2017 in Oakland, California. (Photo by Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images) Photo: Thearon W. Henderson, Getty Images

Photo: Thearon W. Henderson, Getty Images

In one way or another, you order viagra might have various treatment options. Not only that, there are other uses for this jelly sildenafil 100mg tab as well, such as increasing the strength of the penis. If you are intending to use purchase generic viagra sildenafil, make sure that you carefully read the instructions and use the stated dose. When one finds a school that cialis wholesale qualifies in all these parameters, it can be communicated for joining.

OAKLAND, CA – AUGUST 27: Matt Olson #28 and Matt Joyce #23 of the Oakland Athletics celebrates after Olson hit a two-run homer against the Texas Rangers in the bottom of the second inning at Oakland Alameda Coliseum on August 27, 2017 in Oakland, California. (Photo by Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images)

I believe I know what the Oakland Athletics are planning.

Team executive Billy Beane, who eagerly embraces unique ideas and modern science, will have his top young players cryogenically frozen, like Ted Williams’ head. Matt Olson, Matt Chapman, Jharel Cotton and one or two other young hotshots will be popsicled for four or five years, then thawed out in time for the opening of the A’s new ballpark.


That must be Beane’s plan. He has said he’s gathering up a teamload of hot kids so the roster will bloom when the new ballpark opens.

The problem with that is that five — or six, or seven — years down the road, when that new stadium would be ready, the Chapman/Olson/Cotton group, if it lives up to potential, will be ready to be paid major money. Olson is 23, Chapman 24, Cotton 25.

If team owner John Fisher won’t pay a major-league payroll now, why would he be so eager to do a monster jack-up of the A’s payroll after he spends a billion or so on a new ballpark?

Maybe Fisher would do that if he was a crazy-in-the-coconut baseball fan, willing to go in the red for a few years while the money from all the sellouts at the new park cauterizes the team’s monetary outflow. But Fisher is not.

(By the way, I don’t know if cauterize and monetary outflow are actual financial terms. Money is not my field of expertise, but I do pay attention to the A’s situation.)

So here’s a question: If Fisher were gearing up to sell the team as his $30 million-plus annual revenue-sharing gift peters out over the next three years, wouldn’t a great strategy be to stock the A’s with kids working for minimum wage?

That would give Fisher a plausible excuse for not dipping into his pocket for real salaries, and it would make his team much more attractive to a prospective buyer. Who wants to buy a bad-to-mediocre team with a fat payroll?

So maybe part-owner Beane is prepping the team for sale. Or maybe he’s a cryogenics guy.

Scott Ostler is a San Francisco Chronicle columnist. Email: sostler@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @scottostler